Opel Omega 2000 vs Volvo V90 1997

 
Opel Omega
2000 - 2003
Volvo V90
1997 - 1998
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.6 Petrol2.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 180 HP180 HP
Torque: 240 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds9.4 seconds
Volvo V90 is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Omega and Volvo V90 have the same engine power, but Opel Omega torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V90. Opel Omega reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.611.7
Opel Omega consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Opel Omega over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
860 km on highway940 km on highway
Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.86 m
Width: 1.78 m1.75 m
Height: 1.50 m1.45 m
Opel Omega is larger.
Opel Omega is 4 cm longer than the Volvo V90, 3 cm wider, while the height of Opel Omega is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres1702 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters9.7 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means Opel Omega can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2902`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 12002200
Pros and Cons: Opel Omega has
  • lower price
Volvo V90 has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv