Opel Omega 1989 vs Honda Accord 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Opel Omega is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda Accord can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.6 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 73 - 377 HP | 115 - 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 568 NM | 140 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 19 seconds | 7.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 11.0 | 8.2 - 9.6 | |
|
Opel Omega petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Opel Omega is larger. Opel Omega is 14 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
870 litres | no data | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage capacity. Opel Omega has 90 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Omega is 0.5 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Opel Omega can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`942 | ~ 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Omega has
|
Honda Accord has
| |