Opel Mokka 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Opel Mokka engine produces 33 HP less power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Ford Kuga. Despite less power, Opel Mokka reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Mokka consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Opel Mokka over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Mokka consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1310 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Opel Mokka is smaller. Opel Mokka is 25 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Mokka is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 356 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1372 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Opel Mokka has 100 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 196 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Mokka is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`959 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Mokka has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |