Opel Corsa 1996 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1994

 
Opel Corsa
1996 - 1997
Mitsubishi Lancer
1994 - 1996
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 60 HP68 HP
Torque: 112 NM123 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.5 seconds16.2 seconds
Mitsubishi Lancer is a more dynamic driving.
Opel Corsa engine produces 8 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mitsubishi Lancer. Due to the lower power, Opel Corsa reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.36.1
The Opel Corsa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Opel Corsa consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that by driving the Opel Corsa over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 46 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle810 km in combined cycle
Opel Corsa gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.73 m4.28 m
Width: 1.61 m1.68 m
Height: 1.42 m1.38 m
Opel Corsa is smaller, but slightly higher.
Opel Corsa is 55 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Corsa is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1050 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.1 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4101`020
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 1000no data
Pros and Cons: Opel Corsa has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mitsubishi Lancer has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv