Opel Corsa 2000 vs Renault Clio 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 165 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Opel Corsa is more dynamic to drive. Opel Corsa engine produces 10 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Opel Corsa reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 4.6 l/100km | |
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Corsa consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Corsa could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Corsa consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 44 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
880 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Meriva, Opel Combo | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.82 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Opel Corsa is 1 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Corsa is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 510 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1060 litres | no data | |
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Corsa has 250 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Opel Corsa uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Opel Corsa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`580 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | low | |
Opel Corsa has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Opel Corsa, so Opel Corsa quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Opel Corsa has
|
Renault Clio has
| |