Opel Corsa 2000 vs Renault Clio 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.8 | 1.1 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 - 125 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 85 - 170 NM | 93 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 17 seconds | 9.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.9 | 4.2 - 7.4 | |
|
Opel Corsa petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Clio. On average, Opel Corsa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Corsa is 1 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Opel Corsa is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1060 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Corsa has 250 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. This could mean that the Opel Corsa uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Opel Corsa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`482 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Corsa has
|
Renault Clio has
| |