Opel Corsa 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.8 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 58 - 125 HP | 68 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 85 - 170 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 17 seconds | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 7.9 | 4.5 - 7.7 | |
|
Opel Corsa petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Opel Corsa equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.82 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Opel Corsa is smaller, but slightly higher. Opel Corsa is 37 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Corsa is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1060 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Corsa is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Opel Corsa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`482 | ~ 1`088 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Corsa has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |