Opel Calibra 1992 vs Nissan 200 SX 1988
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
| Opel Calibra engine produces 19 HP less power than Nissan 200 SX, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Nissan 200 SX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Calibra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.32 m | 1.29 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Opel Calibra is 5 cm shorter than the Nissan 200 SX, width is practically the same , while the height of Opel Calibra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | no data | |
| Opel Calibra has 20 litres less trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Calibra has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |