Opel Astra 2002 vs Mercedes SLK 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes SLK is a more dynamic driving. Opel Astra engine produces 38 HP less power than Mercedes SLK, but torque is 40 NM more than Mercedes SLK. Due to the lower power, Opel Astra reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Astra consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK, which means that by driving the Opel Astra over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Astra consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Astra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes SLK) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Astra engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes SLK might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.30 m | |
| Opel Astra is 18 cm longer than the Mercedes SLK, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Opel Astra is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 208 litres | |
|
Opel Astra has more luggage capacity. Opel Astra has 122 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes SLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Astra is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mercedes SLK, which means Opel Astra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`705 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mercedes SLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Astra has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mercedes SLK, so Mercedes SLK quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Astra has
|
Mercedes SLK has
| |