Opel Astra 2007 vs Mazda 3 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Opel Astra
2007 - 2010
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.01.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 105 - 200 HP105 - 260 HP
Torque: 150 - 320 NM145 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 14.1 seconds6.1 - 13.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.1 - 9.54.4 - 9.6
Opel Astra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Opel Astra equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 122 mm (4.8 inches)145 - 155 mm (5.7 - 6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.47 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.41 m1.47 m
Opel Astra is larger, but lower.
Opel Astra and Mazda 3 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 205 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
440 litres1360 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Opel Astra has 276 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 920 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Opel Astra is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Opel Astra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`922~ 1`856
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 38004200
Pros and Cons: Opel Astra has
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv