Nissan Primera 1999 vs BMW X3 2005
Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 181 NM | 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
Nissan Primera engine produces 10 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 19 NM less than BMW X3. Despite less power, Nissan Primera reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
By specification Nissan Primera consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Nissan Primera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Primera consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 67 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Almera Tino, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1, BMW Z4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.56 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.67 m | |
Nissan Primera is smaller. Nissan Primera is 4 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Primera is 26 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Primera is 1 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Nissan Primera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 2`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | BMW X3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Primera has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than BMW X3, so BMW X3 quality is probably significantly better | ||
Average price (€): | 600 | 4800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Primera has
|
BMW X3 has
| |