Nissan Juke 2013 vs Nissan Juke 2014

 
Nissan Juke
2013 - 2014
Nissan Juke
2014 - 2019
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 200 HP190 HP
Torque: 250 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds7.8 seconds
Nissan Juke 2013 engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan Juke 2014, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Nissan Juke 2014.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km7.4 l/100km
The Nissan Juke 2014 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Nissan Juke 2013 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke 2014, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke 2013 could require 135 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke 2013 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke 2014.
Fuel tank capacity: 46 litres46 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 660 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway900 km on highway
530 km with real consumption620 km with real consumption
Nissan Juke 2014 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 300'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 14 years14 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.14 m
Width: 1.77 m1.77 m
Height: 1.57 m1.57 m
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke 2013 is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Juke 2014, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres354 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data797 litres
Nissan Juke 2014 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke 2013 has 103 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke 2014. This could mean that the Nissan Juke 2013 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7351`760
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 660010 200
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 9.3/10
Pros and Cons: Nissan Juke has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Nissan Juke has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv