Nissan Juke 2010 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 84 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.2 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 27 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 184 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 516 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage capacity. Nissan Juke has 67 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.7 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan Juke can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |