Nissan Juke 2010 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 70 HP more power than Renault Captur, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Captur. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Captur is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Juke could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Captur gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke is 1 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Juke has 126 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Nissan Juke uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Captur. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`726 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Captur scores higher in safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Renault Captur has
| |