Nissan Juke 2010 vs Opel Mokka 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Juke engine produces 26 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Opel Mokka. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 54 litres | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Cube | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Mokka engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 14 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1372 litres | |
|
Opel Mokka has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 105 litres less trunk space than the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`919 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Opel Mokka scores higher in safety tests. The Opel Mokka scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |