Nissan Juke 2020 vs Peugeot 2008 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 16 HP less power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Due to the lower power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.0 | |
| Nissan Juke consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 2008 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Opel Corsa, Peugeot 308, Opel Combo, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.53 m | |
| Nissan Juke is 9 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Juke is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 422 litres | 405 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1305 litres | 1467 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Juke has 17 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The Peugeot 2008 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 162 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`725 | 1`752 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |