Nissan Juke 2010 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Juke engine produces 7 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Juke consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Nissan Juke over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Juke consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Juke is smaller. Nissan Juke is 19 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 251 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
830 litres | 1520 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 690 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Juke has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |