Nissan Juke 2019 vs Seat Arona 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 117 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Seat Arona is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Juke engine produces 2 HP more power than Seat Arona, but torque is 20 NM less than Seat Arona. Despite the higher power, Nissan Juke reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 40 litres | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.14 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Juke and Seat Arona are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 354 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
422 litres | 1280 litres | |
|
Seat Arona has more luggage space. Nissan Juke has 46 litres less trunk space than the Seat Arona. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Arona (by 858 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.3 metres less than that of the Seat Arona. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Seat Arona has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Seat Arona, so Seat Arona quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Arona has
| |