Nissan Juke 2010 vs Hyundai ix35 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Juke
2010 - 2014
Hyundai ix35
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 1.61.6 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 110 - 200 HP115 - 184 HP
Torque: 150 - 250 NM164 - 383 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 - 11.2 seconds9.4 - 12.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.9 - 7.65.2 - 9.2
Nissan Juke petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai ix35. On average, Nissan Juke equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)170 mm (6.7 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.14 m4.41 m
Width: 1.77 m1.82 m
Height: 1.57 m1.67 m
Nissan Juke is smaller.
Nissan Juke is 27 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Juke is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres591 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
830 litres1436 litres
Hyundai ix35 has more luggage space.
Nissan Juke has 340 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai ix35 (by 606 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Juke is 0.1 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`785~ 2`044
Safety:
Hyundai ix35 scores higher in safety tests.
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 66007800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Juke has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Hyundai ix35 has
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv