Nissan Almera 2000 vs Audi A3 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Audi A3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 20 HP less power than Audi A3, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Audi A3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera is 3 cm longer than the Audi A3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 1120 litres | |
| Nissan Almera has 85 litres more trunk space than the Audi A3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A3 (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A3, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Audi A3 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan Almera, so Audi A3 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Audi A3 has
| |