Nissan Almera 2000 vs Fiat Stilo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 255 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 5 HP less power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Fiat Stilo. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Fiat Stilo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Almera could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Nissan Almera and Fiat Stilo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |