Nissan Almera 2003 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera engine produces 24 HP more power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 69 NM more than Nissan Almera Tino. Thanks to more power Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Almera engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Primera, Nissan Almera Tino | Used also on Nissan Almera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Almera might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is smaller. Nissan Almera is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera Tino, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage space. Nissan Almera has 85 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 930 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |