Nissan Almera 2003 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 248 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Almera is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Almera and Nissan Almera Tino have the same engine power, but Nissan Almera torque is 13 NM more than Nissan Almera Tino. Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Almera consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1010 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Almera Tino can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Almera Tino version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Almera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is smaller. Nissan Almera is 6 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera Tino, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage space. Nissan Almera has 85 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 930 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`810 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |