Nissan Almera 2002 vs Fiat Stilo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Fiat Stilo is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Almera engine produces 5 HP less power than Fiat Stilo, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Fiat Stilo. Due to the lower power, Nissan Almera reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Almera consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo, which means that by driving the Nissan Almera over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Almera consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Stilo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Fiat Doblo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Fiat Stilo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Fiat Stilo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Nissan Almera is 2 cm longer than the Fiat Stilo, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Stilo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`710 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Fiat Stilo has serious deffects in 145 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Fiat Stilo has
| |