Nissan Almera 2002 vs Mazda 3 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Almera
2002 - 2006
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.21.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 82 - 136 HP105 - 150 HP
Torque: 136 - 304 NM145 - 245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 14.5 seconds9 - 12.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 7.85.0 - 8.2
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.49 m
Width: 1.71 m1.76 m
Height: 1.45 m1.46 m
Nissan Almera is smaller.
Nissan Almera is 29 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres413 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1020 litres675 litres
Nissan Almera has 58 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 345 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`762~ 1`718
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 10001200
Rating in user reviews: 9.4/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Nissan Almera has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv