Nissan Almera 2000 vs Alfa Romeo 147 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 114 HP | 100 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 230 NM | 140 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 13.8 seconds | 9.1 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 7.8 | 5.8 - 8.9 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 147. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 147. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera is 1 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 147, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1100 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity. Nissan Almera has 75 litres more trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 147. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 1.1 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 147, which means Nissan Almera can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`740 | ~ 1`764 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
| |