Nissan Almera 2002 vs Toyota Corolla 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Almera
2002 - 2006
Toyota Corolla
2004 - 2007
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.5 - 2.21.4 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 82 - 136 HP90 - 225 HP
Torque: 136 - 304 NM130 - 280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 14.5 seconds6.8 - 14.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 7.84.8 - 9.0
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.20 m4.19 m
Width: 1.71 m1.71 m
Height: 1.45 m1.48 m
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Almera is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Almera is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 355 litres310 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1020 litresno data
Nissan Almera has more luggage capacity.
Nissan Almera has 45 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla.
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`756~ 1`238
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

high
Average price (€): 10002000
Rating in user reviews: 9.4/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons: Nissan Almera has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Toyota Corolla has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv