Nissan Almera 2002 vs Mazda 3 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.2 | 1.3 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 136 HP | 84 - 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 - 304 NM | 122 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 14.5 seconds | 9 - 14.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 7.8 | 5.0 - 8.2 | |
|
Nissan Almera petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Nissan Almera equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Nissan Almera is smaller. Nissan Almera is 25 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Almera is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 355 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1020 litres | 878 litres | |
| Nissan Almera has 126 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 142 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Almera is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`756 | ~ 1`728 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.4/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Almera has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |