Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 2 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`260 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |