Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998 vs Ford Galaxy 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 215 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 299 NM | 268 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 11 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 31 NM more than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 11.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
| |