Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992 vs Honda Stream 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 133 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 23 HP less power than Honda Stream, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Honda Stream. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Stream is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Wagon could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 7 cm shorter than the Honda Stream, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 212 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 1520 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mitsubishi Space Wagon has more luggage space (by 54 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 194 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Honda Stream has
| |