Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 20.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 16 HP less power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Mercedes Vito. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes Vito gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.58 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 16 cm shorter than the Mercedes Vito, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 212 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 1.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |