Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 35 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
240 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |