Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 15.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |