Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2000 vs Mazda MPV 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine produces 14 HP more power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Mazda MPV. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Wagon reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Wagon consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Wagon over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MPV engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda MPV, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 240 litres | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 240 litres | 294 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1930 litres | 1600 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mazda MPV has more luggage space (by 54 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 330 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda MPV, which means Mitsubishi Space Wagon can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |