Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991 vs Honda Stream 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.7 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 - 133 HP | 125 - 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 146 - 176 NM | 154 - 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 - 17.8 seconds | 9.4 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 - 10.8 | 7.7 - 9.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Stream. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.59 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Wagon is 6 cm shorter than the Honda Stream, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 212 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1714 litres | 1520 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Wagon has 54 litres more trunk space than the Honda Stream. The Honda Stream may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 194 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`927 | ~ 1`974 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
|
Honda Stream has
| |