Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner and Mitsubishi Space Wagon have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.8 | 8.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 23 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.58 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 25 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 1714 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 464 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. The Mitsubishi Space Wagon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 216 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |