Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 engine produces 54 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 1800 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 has 246 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999. The Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 (by 302 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |