Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Chrysler Voyager 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 36 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 25 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner has 5 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 2.3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |