Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 36 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.7 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 63 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 3990 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 3990 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 3314 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2492 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 3 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |