Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Renault Espace 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Renault Espace is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 16 HP less power than Renault Espace, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Renault Espace. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.6 | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 25 cm shorter than the Renault Espace, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 676 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 2850 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Espace (by 1352 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Espace, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Renault Espace has
| |