Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995 vs Mazda MPV 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 172 NM | 277 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda MPV is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 33 HP less power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Mazda MPV. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 74 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Space Runner) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MPV) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 40 cm shorter than the Mazda MPV, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 282 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 282 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 676 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 1060 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 438 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`370 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |