Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Ford Galaxy 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 5 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, but torque is 8 NM less than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 35 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |