Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Opel Sintra 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 21 HP less power than Opel Sintra, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Opel Sintra. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Sintra, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Sintra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used also on Opel Frontera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 40 cm shorter than the Opel Sintra, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 676 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 3765 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Sintra (by 2267 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1.2 metres less than that of the Opel Sintra, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`345 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Opel Sintra has
| |