Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 225 NM | 176 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 engine produces 17 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.6 | |
Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
810 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 520'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 39 years | 44 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Space Wagon, Mitsubishi Galant | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.29 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.65 m | 1.66 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 676 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1498 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 has 246 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 (by 302 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner 1997. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`745 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |