Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1998
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 20 HP more power than Isuzu Rodeo, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Isuzu Rodeo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Rodeo, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Space Runner) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Isuzu Rodeo) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 22 cm shorter than the Isuzu Rodeo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 933 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 2297 litres | |
|
Isuzu Rodeo has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 503 litres less trunk space than the Isuzu Rodeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Isuzu Rodeo (by 497 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 2`065 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |