Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 299 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 79 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 121 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 11.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Runner over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 32 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 31 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1930 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 190 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. The Mitsubishi Space Wagon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |