Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 26 HP more power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.4 | |
|
The Toyota Corolla Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Corolla Verso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla Verso, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner has 13 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |