Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 31 HP more power than Renault Scenic, but torque is 22 NM less than Renault Scenic. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 5.9 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 495 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 12 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |