Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Opel Zafira 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 35 HP more power than Opel Zafira, but torque is 52 NM less than Opel Zafira. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 6.6 | |
|
The Opel Zafira is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Opel Zafira gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Signum | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 3 cm shorter than the Opel Zafira, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1700 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Zafira. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`020 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Opel Zafira has
| |